title for Analysphere.com


10 Aug
2005

















subheading icon
this blog

about

site use

contact



subheading icon
archive

2005

earlier




subheading icon
related
sites


Caslon

Ketupa

















subheading icon     digital scholarly publishing

The UK Digital Curation Centre (DCC), an academic and institutional consortium grappling with questions about long term access to digital media, has released the first part of its first online Digital Curation Manual.

The DCC Manual is being developed collaboratively as a peer reviewed “community-driven resource” for use by data creators, curators and re-users. It is envisaged that each part of the Manual will provide an introduction to a topic, an explanation of terminology, suggestions for best practice and ­ as importantly - real-life examples. Parts will be reviewed and updated annually.

The first part, by Andrew McHugh, covers Open Source for Digital Curation. It discusses digital curation questions in relation to open source software, describes examples of current use of open source, identifies open source applications of particular interest offers guidelines for institutions. It will be followed shortly by parts on metadata and curation of dynamic data.

SPARC and the Open Society Institute (OSI) have meanwhile released two new guides about scholarly publishing. They are a reminder that the DCC’s concerns about a whole of lifecycle approach to archiving electronic publications is for naught if publication doesn’t proceed or remains locked up by a particular body.

As the title suggests, the SPARC Sponsorships for Nonprofit Scholarly & Scientific Journals: A Guide to Defining & Negotiating Successful Sponsorships guide is an aid to scholarly publishers finding sponsors and managing the corporate sponsorship process, which is broader than philanthropy or advertising. The Guide aims to help “nonprofit publishers evaluate the viability of implementing a corporate sponsorship program and describes ways to develop a sponsorship program as a component of the journal's income stream”. It has a strong US flavour but comments are applicable to Australian publishing, particularly for Australian-based scientific/technical journals with an international readership. It is of relevance because Australian sponsorship facilitation bodies such as ABAF have neglected scholarly publishing ­ and more broadly the humanities and sciences ­ in favour of the performing and visual arts.

The OSI Guide to Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Societies also has a practical approach to scholarly publishing. The Guide was authored by Jan Velterop, former publisher of the exemplary BioMed Central. It is refreshingly modest, indicating that it

    has a limited scope. It is meant to help scholarly societies - and small publishers - assess the options available to them for the future of their journal publishing programmes. Though the option of keeping the status quo of subscription-based journals is discussed, the focus is on conversion of existing journals to open access, either in one go, or via an intermediate managed transition phase … For societies that make the choice for open access, this guide aims to provide practical help to reduce or even eliminate financial risks and make conversion of an existing journal into an open access one a smooth and professional process.
Consistent with the aims of the Soros Foundation, the OSI’s funder, the Guide comments that
    Scholarly Societies are 'natural' Open Access publishers ... A society serious about furthering the science and practice in its chosen field is bound to consider these benefits and to look for ways of using them wherever possible for the attainment of its goals.
Velterop concludes that societies moving to open access publishing will “do much to further the widespread dissemination of knowledge in the area of science that they foster and promote”. He also questions the often deep-seated belief that scholarly and professional organizations accrue greater financial benefits from traditional paid-access publishing models ­ “this is a false perception”. OA of course shifts rather than eliminates or necessarily reduces costs, one reason why the SPARC Guide is significant.



::





this site
the web

Google
 




related pages icon
recent
entries


hhh

© 2005